The Illusion of Hope: Visibility and Injustice

Change begins the moment injustice is made visible.

How Rituals Conceal — and Why Visibility Is the Beginning of Justice.

The Comfort of Rituals

The turn of the year is one of tho­se moments in which the world pre­tends to be who­le. People wish for peace as if peace could be sum­mo­ned by desi­re alo­ne, and ritu­als, tra­di­ti­ons, as well as the clo­sen­ess of fami­ly and fri­ends crea­te, for a flee­ting instant, the illu­si­on that the world might smooth its­elf out—a moment that allows us to belie­ve that peace is possible.

People for­gi­ve one ano­ther, fami­lies draw clo­ser, and for a short while hope seems stron­ger than rea­li­ty. Yet this calm is fra­gi­le. When the war in Ukraine began, bare­ly two months had pas­sed sin­ce our New Year’s wis­hes and the first shock to Europe, and today that war has been raging for near­ly four years.

Since then, ano­ther war has been added: the Gaza War, now in its third year. Once again, Europe finds its­elf facing the fear of being drawn into a wider con­flict, while Germany deba­tes rear­ma­ment, mili­ta­ry strength, and deter­rence, as if the­se were the only means by which secu­ri­ty could be created.

Hope as Emotion – Injustice as Mechanism 

Hope is an inner reflex that pro­tects us when the world beco­mes too hea­vy. Injustice, howe­ver, is not a fee­ling. It is a mecha­nism, an exter­nal and struc­tu­ral pro­cess that con­ti­nues to ope­ra­te unless it is dis­rupt­ed, named, or made visi­ble. Such mecha­nisms do not dis­sol­ve through emo­ti­on; they dis­sol­ve through reco­gni­ti­on, through obser­va­ti­on, and through the act of making them visible.

Yet many peo­p­le who expe­ri­ence inju­s­ti­ce direct­ly, dai­ly, and in exis­ten­ti­al ways have long lost hope. Others live in sta­ble and pro­spe­rous count­ries and feel secu­re becau­se they have built wealth, until war threa­tens and that wealth sud­den­ly reve­als its fragility.

Prosperity Rarely Emerges Neutrally

Historians and eco­no­mists remind us that pro­spe­ri­ty does not ari­se in a vacu­um. It is the pro­duct of rela­ti­onships bet­ween sta­tes, rela­ti­onships that have rare­ly been equal. Without glo­bal ine­qua­li­ty, European pro­spe­ri­ty would not have expan­ded with such speed or on such a scale.

Colonialism, resour­ce extra­c­tion, une­qual trade agree­ments, sphe­res of poli­ti­cal influence, inter­na­tio­nal cre­dit struc­tures, mili­ta­ry power rela­ti­ons, and tech­no­lo­gi­cal mono­po­lies streng­the­ned some nati­ons while sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly wea­k­e­ning others. Injustice is not an acci­dent; it is architecture.

When Practice Betrays Theory

A world wit­hout struc­tu­ral inju­s­ti­ce would face only inter­per­so­nal con­flicts, and that is pre­cis­e­ly why jus­ti­ce sys­tems exist. But jus­ti­ce that does not act is not jus­ti­ce. Corruption that is not named is not a mar­gi­nal issue but a sym­ptom, and a demo­cra­cy who­se prac­ti­ce diver­ges from its own theo­ry is not a demo­cra­cy but an imi­ta­ti­on of one.

The rule of law is the back­bone of demo­cra­cy, not elec­tions alo­ne and not the mere exis­tence of mul­ti­ple par­ties. The true dan­ger to demo­cra­ci­es is not the exter­nal ene­my; it is the quiet hol­lo­wing out from within, the faça­de that remains stan­ding while ever­y­thing behind it decays. A strong demo­cra­cy has not­hing to fear. It inspi­res even tho­se who live under dic­ta­tor­ships and still hold on to the hope of change.

Invisibility as an Instrument of Power

As long as inju­s­ti­ce remains invi­si­ble, power remains untoucha­ble; as long as it is not docu­men­ted, it remains unde­niable; and as long as it is not made public, it remains unstoppable. The world has grown accus­to­med to trea­ting inju­s­ti­ce as a natu­ral con­di­ti­on, some­thing to be accept­ed becau­se it appears unch­an­geable and any attempt at chan­ge seems like an illu­si­on. Yet it is pre­cis­e­ly in this habi­tua­ti­on that its deepest dan­ger lies.

Systemic inju­s­ti­ce is rare­ly spec­ta­cu­lar. It is quiet, it is ordi­na­ry, and it sur­vi­ves not through vio­lence but through habi­tua­ti­on. It is not hid­den; it is accept­ed. And over time, it no lon­ger appears as wrong­do­ing but as order.

Visibility as Action

Hope wit­hout action is self‑deception; hope wit­hout visi­bi­li­ty is sta­gna­ti­on; and hope wit­hout docu­men­ta­ti­on is com­pli­ci­ty. Those who seek chan­ge must first see and make visi­ble, for only what is visi­ble can be wit­nessed, and only what is wit­nessed has the power to shake the world out of its habituation.

A bet­ter world does not emer­ge from the hope that it will chan­ge on its own, but from the decis­i­on to name rea­li­ty, to docu­ment it, and to make it public. Visibility is not a ges­tu­re but an inter­ven­ti­on, a deli­be­ra­te dis­rup­ti­on of the mecha­nisms that pro­du­ce and sus­tain inju­s­ti­ce. Every publi­ca­ti­on, every docu­ment, and every dos­sier is a step out of power­less­ness and into self‑empowerment; chan­ge beg­ins not with the desi­re for jus­ti­ce but with the refu­sal to keep inju­s­ti­ce concealed.

A New Year Begins Not With Hope—but With Action

This is how the new year beg­ins, as The Injustice Chronicle under­stands it: not hoping but acting.